Archive for February, 2006

Feb 28 2006

Let them eat cake.

Published by Karl under Boyington

In my last blog I listed a few of what I considered to be the less important matters the Student Senators had debated and resolved this session, including this one:
A Resolution In Support Of Cake A Resolution in Support of Cake WHEREAS anthropologists have concluded that agriculture is the single most important human technology ever developed, and; WHEREAS agriculture allowed the production of refined flours which are vital ingredients for delicious cake, and; WHEREAS cake is by all means considered a tasty dessert and treat, and; WHEREAS Marie Antoinette is frequently referenced to have said, �Let them eat cake!� and; WHEREAS all must acquiesce to the irresistible power of cake, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: THAT the ASUW wholly supports and consumes cake in all its forms and formally requests the presence of a scrumptious cake at the final meeting of the Student Senate�s twelfth session to be provided by the beloved SAO advisor.

All in fun, and quite yummy sounding. But did you know that cake will cost the taxpayers money? To be exact, $13,745.00 That’s because the four officers of the UW Student Senate draw a stipend each year.

SENATE CHAIR $4,403. SENATE VICE-CHAIR $3,273. SENATE SECRETARY $2,890. MEMBERSHIP COORDINATOR $3,179.

One response so far

Feb 28 2006

Jill Edwards: In her own words

Published by Karl under Boyington

This is not meant to disrespect Miss Edwards. If anything it is an opportunity for her side of the story to be shown. In surfing around other Boyington stories, I came upon a link to her after session notes that she posts as a part of her representation of the Honors Croquet League…No I am not making that up…I could never have made that up. Oh come on, it isn’t that bad. Moving on….. As I was saying, in honest fairness, I think it is important to see how she felt about the fray. I am going to post, unedited, her notes from 2-7-2006 (the day of the initial debate and her notes from 2-21-2006. In fairness, suspend judgment till you read them all. I have only one comment, which I will save until the end.

February 7, 2006 Senate this week was interesting. I talked more than I ever have before and realized exactly why I never talk. I apparently upset a lot of people when I opposed a memorial for a Colonel from WWII who had recieved a Medal of Honor and who was a UW graduate. This was the main discussion and rather than go into it, I think I would rather post some of the charming and sweet letters I have recieved since then. ". . . most of you aren’t informed at all about that which you discuss. That’s a sad commentary about a university education that is supported by my tax dollars. No doubt you all have been corrected for your erroneous and sometimes outrageous remarks (Jill Edwards, Ashley Williams). It is one thing to stand up for your political beliefs. It’s entirely another to totally misrepresent the truth for political reasons." "Against overwhelming odds, [Boyington] helped the overall cause of stopping what had been started on Dec. 7th, 1941 when the United States was attacked by the Empire of Japan. Or had you forgotten? Or did you ever even know? You should be honored that such a person is an alumnus of your school. Most schools can’t claim such an honorable person. I’m just sorry that your school has to claim you." "If it were not for a lot of people like Greg Boyington, you’d probably be attending classes in German or Japanese……….. Kinda sad—but such is life in the Socialist Soviet of Seattle, ‘ay? " So there you have it. Thanks, I am thouroughly regretting opeining my mouth. No quote of the week this week, I think the above suffice.

No responses yet

Feb 27 2006

The New Bush Defenders: the LA Times?

Published by Karl under Bush, National News, Politics, UAE

I mean just the thought of it is incredible enough. The LA Times has earned it’s reputation as one of the more liberally slanting newspapers, but in a recent series of editorials, it has nicely skewered the left’s criticism of the Dubai Ports World issue, including a few very choice comments for California’s own US Sen Barbara Boxer(d). The issue should have died out, as the truth of the proposal became clear. Indeed, as noted by Sister Toldjah, many conservatives have begun changing what was a nervous and skeptical mindset into growing support as the facts begin to be made clear. No, the Arabs have not taken over the mightiest ports in America. Swarthy men are not unloading our ships and planting suitcase bombs in our imported toasters. The Teamsters and Longshoremen still control the loading, the Company only over sees logistics. Customs and the Coast Guard still maintain security. The Democrats however, seeing this as a pollsters cash cow have tightened their gripe on the misinformation machine and have jumped on their band wagon with all gun’s firing. And people are buying their fear tactics. Barbara is one of the many fear slongers seeing this as a Golden Ticket. The facts are simple, this is a non story. Even the UAE has respectfully asked for a delay and review just to appease nervous xenophobes. (See here for a good collection of informative links on the disinformation:
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/27/disinformation-campaign-on-the-uae-port-deal) Now, on to the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-ports22feb22,0,4937386.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials Port hysteria WHEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TAKE homeland security seriously, it’s a welcome development. Unfortunately, Tuesday’s bipartisan hissy fit over the Bush administration’s approval of a Dubai company’s $6.8-billion deal to manage six important U.S. ports is neither serious nor welcome. At first glance, Dubai Ports World’s acquisition of the British-owned Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. looks troubling: Do we really want a company from the United Arab Emirates, one of the only countries that recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, acting as the maritime gatekeeper for New York, Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore and Newark, N.J.? After all, ports could be appealing and vulnerable targets for terrorists, handling about 2 billion tons of freight each year, only 5% of which receives close inspection. The remaining containers are vetted through an informal process that emphasizes faith in "trusted shippers." The problem is that blocking the Dubai deal wouldn’t do a thing to change any of that. It only provides members of Congress an opportunity to talk tough and pander to the terrorism-rattled xenophobe in us all. Dubai Ports World, like the foreign companies that already run the majority of key U.S. ports; including 80% of the terminals in Los Angeles; does not own the points of entry. It is a contractor that coordinates logistics. And most important, it’s not in charge of security. (emphasis mine) Port operators work with U.S. security officials (port police, the Coast Guard, the Department of Homeland Security) in charge of preventing terrorism. This week’s hubbub diverts attention from a pressing and genuine debate over what those agencies really need to do to keep our commercial harbors safe. Compared to airport security, port security is woefully underfunded and undeveloped. A paper written by former Coast Guard Cmdr. Stephen E. Flynn in the current issue of the Far Eastern Economic Review calls the system a "house of cards." Flynn argues that any terrorist worth his salt could simply seek out a well-known "trusted" shipper’s containers to stash his deadly contraband. He calls for a slate of inspection-oriented reforms, including the adoption of better screening technologies. Who owns the companies that operate the ports isn’t the point; it’s how those companies work together with federal and local authorities to keep ports safe. And the Department of Homeland Security has a long way to go before it figures out how best to get that done. To be fair, congressional calls for transparency in the bidding process make sense. And any attention paid to port security is better than none at all. But by focusing on the nationality of a respected ports operator, instead of scrutinizing questionable policies or providing tangible suggestions for making the nation safer, members of Congress have once again shown their unerring knack for irrelevance when it comes to matters of homeland security.

No responses yet

Feb 24 2006

UW Senate Steering Committee discuss and edit Jill and Ashley’s remarks

Published by Karl under Boyington

The Boyington Memorial flap was largely based on the minutes of the Senate session dates 2-7-2006. Those meetings were displayed on the UW Senate site at: http://senate.asuw.org/secretary/senminutes.shtml At some point however the file for the meeting in question was renamed to 02-07-2006-draft, and an apparently approved copy was added. The changes were fairly subtle, but I always wondered why there was a draft copy at all, since that was the only draft edition of a set of minutes, dating back to 2002. So I looked around and found the answer. There is a second minutes site, the minutes for the Senate Steering Committee, and they are kept here: http://senate.asuw.org/secretary/strminutes.shtml In the 2-13-2006 Steering Committee there was much discussion about those minutes, particularly the comments made by Ashley Miller (rich white men) and Jill Miller (UW does not want to produce Marines). Here is an excerpt from those minutes that concerns those comments. Question to the reader: Was the committee concerned with saving face or clarifying the comments?

IX. Approval of the Minutes Alex Kim noted that he requested a draftversion of the minutes be posted online before the Steering Committee considered them. Shawn Fisher noted Steering Committee would meet this Friday at 3:30. Erin Shields said she was concerned over the quote that Jill Edwards is quoted to say. Alex Kim noted Jill Edwards contacted him asking him to add a quote regarding her respect for veterans. Erin Shields said she was concerned with the phraseology of the quote. Sam Al-Khoury said he thought the general thought was somewhat conveyed by the minutes. He moved to remove the reference to the Marine Corps and instead say "a person who kills others."

No responses yet

Feb 23 2006

UAE Port deal: problem or waste of bandwidth?

Published by Karl under Politics, UAE, terrorism

I expressed my concerns previously about the UAE Dubai Ports World issue in this blog: http://guitarplayr.blogspot.com/2006/02/now-i-know-its-bad-idea.html At that point, the best reason to dislike the deal was the fact former President Jimmy Carter supported it, a point I still find compelling. But after reviewing the facts, hearing the talking points, and reading an insane number of blogs, I am beginning to believe this is not only a serious waste of time, but it may not be such a bad idea after all. See Sister Toldjah for a lot more detailed information and a ton of great links. She has done some of her best work here.. My basic reasons to support it, or at least to feel there is little reason to oppose it, are these:
  • There will be no changes in the present security procedures. This company takes over port management only, not security or loading operations.
  • The UAE has been a consistent ally in the war on terror.
  • Dubai Ports World already operates ports around the world including Australia, China, Korea, Malaysia, India, Germany and Venezuela. They are experienced and have a very respected reputation. If there are issues, let some of those countries step forward and let the record be known.

No responses yet

Feb 22 2006

The UW MOH Memorial: Let’s make sure they get it right

Published by Karl under Boyington

I admit my last blog about this was fairly angry. I was very upset about the events that had transpired, and I decided to show it. I was, and I still am fairly disgusted with the editors of the Seattle PI for trying to make a silk purse from a sows ear. But it occurred to me today that this, like so many things is life, has all the ingredients of an opportunity to make it right. I decided to look up the details of the 5 men who earned the Medal Of Honor (MOH), and I discovered they all had unique stories worthy of telling. I remarked to Kirby Wilbur via email that I doubted any of the students had even bothered to do the 5 minutes of google searching it took me to find all five citations. While that may be true of some of them, it is not true of all, because I found that the new resolution introduced to the Senate contains the details of all five men. The resolution, R-12-26 - A Resolution Calling a Memorial for UW Alumni awarded the Medal of Honor can be read here: http://senate.asuw.org/legislation/12/R/R-12-26.html I will post it below in a moment. I am blogging this tonight to say that while I think the original resolution had merit, this one can be just as good, if a few things are done to ensure it doesn’t fall prey to correctness. The new resolution was written by the same person as the original, so I am fairly confident he has the intention of making this a sober, respectful and comprehensive memorial. I am also, however, cynical enough that I do not trust that his peers will not try to "PC" it, and dumb it down to make it more generic, as they did his original resolution. This must not be allowed to happen. If these men are to be honored they should be honored in the full context of their achievement and valor, which to me requires nothing less then the full citation that accompanied their award, and a brief historical bio and context for each one, in separate steles. In the case of one soldier, this to me is particularly important: PFC William K Nakamura, the only non graduate, and the only enlisted person as well, as fate would have it. The PI noted that he had his studies interrupted by the interment camps in 1942. What they glossed over was that he enlisted in the army and became a member of what would become one of the most highly decorated regiments in U.S. history, the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, 34th "Red Bull" Division, U.S. 5th Army. He was the first Army volunteer from Minidoka Relocation Center to be killed in action. And he was the only one of the 5 whose medal was not awarded until June 21, 2000 because his original recommendation for the MOH had been downgraded to the Distinguished Cross, arguably due to his being Japanese. Additionally, on September 19, 2000, the King County Council passed a resolution urging Congress to name a planned new Federal Courthouse in Seattle after Nakamura. The Seattle City Council passed a similar resolution. Congress responded in November 2000 by renaming the existing courthouse (at Madison Street and 5th Avenue) in his honor. (source: http://www.historylink.org/output.cfm?file_id=2767) Is his tale not one that should be told, and be told in it’s full context? And can less truly be said about any of the others? If the Senate makes this a simple 5 names on a plaque with a pretty ribbon, lacking any details and context, who will tell the full story of these men, why they are honored and what their sacrifice represents? Please join me in encouraging all parties to put aside agendas and ideologies and do the right thing. It’s ironic that the PI was right, but for the wrong reasons. Yes, the debate can lead to a greater more meaningful monument, but only if the students, with our encouragement and support do the right thing. Here is the link to their contact information: http://senate.asuw.org/membership/membershipdb.cgi Write them and ask for their support in making this a memorial all can be proud of. It’s time to get this right. A Resolution Calling a Memorial for UW Alumni awarded the Medal of Honor WHEREAS the Medal of Honor is the highest award an American can receive, which is awarded for "for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life, above and beyond the call of duty, in actual combat against an armed enemy force.", and, WHEREAS the University of Washington has produced five men who have been awarded the Medal of Honor, two of those awards being at cost of their lives, these men are: - Col. (then Maj.) Gregory Boyington, USMC (Class of 1934) who during the period 12 September 1943 to 3 January 1944 as commander of Marine Fighting Squadron-214 in the Central Solomons area, the highest scoring Marine fighter ace of World War II, did consistently outnumbered throughout successive hazardous flights over heavily defended hostile territory, Maj. Boyington struck at the enemy with daring and courageous persistence, leading his squadron into combat with devastating results to Japanese shipping, shore installations, and aerial forces and, by his forceful leadership, developed the combat readiness in his command which was a distinctive factor in the Allied aerial achievements in this vitally strategic area. - 1LT Deming Bronson, USA (Class of 1914) - who during the period 26-27 September 1918 near Eclisfontaine, France, while repeatedly wounded, refused treatment and evacuation multiple times, and while so doing affected the capture of many enemy prisoners in capturing an entrenched position, engaged in the capture of Eclisfontaine, France, and After the capture he remained with Company E and participated with it in the capture of an enemy machinegun, he himself killing the enemy gunner. Shortly after this encounter the company was compelled to retire due to the heavy enemy artillery barrage. During this retirement 1st Lt. Bronson, who was the last man to leave the advanced position, was again wounded in both arms by an enemy high-explosive shell. He was then assisted to cover by another officer who applied first aid. Although bleeding profusely and faint from the loss of blood, 1st Lt. Bronson remained with the survivors of the company throughout the night of the second day, refusing to go to the rear for treatment. His conspicuous gallantry and spirit of self-sacrifice were a source of great inspiration to the members of the entire command. - Brig. Gen (then Maj.) Robert Galer, USMC (Class of 1935) who from May 1942 to March 1943 as commander of Marine Fighting Squadron-224 in the Central Solomons area, did demonstrate conspicuous heroism and courage above and beyond the call of duty as leader of a marine fighter squadron in aerial combat with enemy Japanese forces in the Solomon Islands area. Leading his squadron repeatedly in daring and aggressive raids against Japanese aerial forces, vastly superior in numbers, Maj. Galer availed himself of every favorable attack opportunity. His superb airmanship, his outstanding skill and personal valor reflect great credit upon Maj. Galer’s gallant fighting spirit and upon the U.S. Naval Service. - 2LT Robert R. Leisy, USA (Class of 1968) who on 2 December 1969 in the Phuoc Long province, Republic of Vietnam, did demonstrate For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty. 2d Lt. Leisy, Infantry, Company B, distinguished himself while serving as platoon leader during a reconnaissance mission. One of his patrols became heavily engaged by fire from a numerically superior enemy force located in a well-entrenched bunker complex. As 2d Lt. Leisy deployed the remainder of his platoon to rescue the beleaguered patrol, the platoon also came under intense enemy fire from the front and both flanks. In complete disregard for his safety, 2d Lt. Leisy moved from position to position deploying his men to effectively engage the enemy. Accompanied by his radio operator he moved to the front and spotted an enemy sniper in a tree in the act of firing a rocket-propelled grenade at them. Realizing there was neither time to escape the grenade nor shout a warning, 2d Lt. Leisy unhesitatingly, and with full knowledge of the consequences, shielded the radio operator with his body and absorbed the full impact of the explosion. This valorous act saved the life of the radio operator and protected other men of his platoon who were nearby from serious injury. Despite his mortal wounds, 2d Lt. Leisy calmly and confidently continued to direct the platoon’s fire. When medical aid arrived, 2d Lt. Leisy valiantly refused attention until the other seriously wounded were treated. His display of extraordinary courage and exemplary devotion to duty provided the inspiration and leadership that enabled his platoon to successfully withdraw without further casualties. 2d Lt. Leisy’s gallantry at the cost of his life are in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit on him, his unit, and the U.S. Army. - PFC William K. Nakamura, USA (non-graduate, left the UW in 1942) who on 4 July 1944 near Castellina, Italy, During a fierce firefight, Private First Class Nakamura’s platoon became pinned down by enemy machine gun fire from a concealed position. On his own initiative, Private First Class Nakamura crawled 20 yards toward the hostile nest with fire from the enemy machine gun barely missing him. Reaching a point 15 yards from the position, he quickly raised himself to a kneeling position and threw four hand grenades, killing or wounding at least three of the enemy soldiers. The enemy weapon silenced, Private First Class Nakamura crawled back to his platoon, which was able to continue its advance as a result of his courageous action. Later, his company was ordered to withdraw from the crest of a hill so that a mortar barrage could be placed on the ridge. On his own initiative, Private First Class Nakamura remained in position to cover his comrade’s withdrawal. While moving toward the safety of a wooded draw, his platoon became pinned down by deadly machine gun fire. Crawling to a point from which he could fire on the enemy position, Private First Class Nakamura quickly and accurately fired his weapon to pin down the enemy machine gunners. His platoon was then able to withdraw to safety without further casualties. Private First Class Nakamura was killed during this heroic stand. Private First Class Nakamura’s extraordinary heroism and devotion to duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of military service and reflect great credit on him, his unit, and the United States Army. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: THAT we consider these men to be a prime example of the excellence that this university represents and strives to impart upon its students, and, THAT we desire for a memorial, consisting of stele, for these men be commenced by the University of Washington as quickly as funding can be secured, and the design, arrangement & placement of stele have been agreed upon, which will be publicly displayed, so that all who come here in future years will know that the University of Washington produced five of this country’s bravest men, and that we as a community hold this fact in the highest esteem, and THAT for all future instances of a UW alumnus being awarded the Medal of Honor, that the addition of a stele for that person should be commenced without delay and added to the memorial.

No responses yet

Feb 22 2006

Scarborough Country: The Boyington debate

Published by Karl under Boyington

Last night in my response to the PI’s hatchet editorial of bloggers and talk radio concerning the UW memorial, I mentioned the latest bit of stupidity that was being under reported, that being when UW student Nicholas Baptiste appeared on MSNBC’s Scarboough Country, and said:

How about we put up instead of yet another statue of a World War II hero, how about we put up a statue of a slab of flesh, no arms, no legs, no face, like the main character in Dalton Trumbo’s "Johnny Got His Gun"?

One response so far

Feb 22 2006

Letter to the Seattle P-I PU - Advanced Civics: Disgust at work

Published by Karl under Boyington, MSM

The Seattle PU I mean PI has once again shown the lack of intelligence in Intelligencer. The editorial board has taken the bloggers and talk radio to task for denouncing the Student Senates trashing of a world war 2 hero. See my previous blogs: http://guitarplayr.blogspot.com/2006/02/baa-baa-humbug.html http://guitarplayr.blogspot.com/2006/02/hey-jill-you-mean-these-marines.html http://guitarplayr.blogspot.com/2006/02/pappy-boyington-memorial-idea-still.html http://guitarplayr.blogspot.com/2006/02/more-thoughts-on-pappy-boyington.html The students denied him a memorial for reasons ranging from race and class, anti war sentiments and anti military sentiments. The reaction has been understandably heated as many people are actually proud of the military and our nation’s war heroes. The latest travesty is under reported however, when a student named Nicholas Baptiste appeared on television’s Scarborough Country and reportedly told the host:

How about we put up instead of yet another statue of a World War II hero, let’s put up a slab of flesh, no arms, legs, face like the main character in Johnny Got His Gun.

No responses yet

Feb 21 2006

Now I know it’s a bad idea….

Published by Karl under National News, UAE, terrorism

I have refrained till now on posting about the Bush plan to support the UAE purchase of a seaport company, effectively giving it control of 6 Eastern US seaports. As I commented at Sister Toldjah:

for the moment I am undecided but leaning against it. It is not like we don�?t already have a heavy foreign presence, but the amount of this one is kind of concerning. What also concerns me though is that this could be knee jerk xenophobia. So I want to know more, and like I really want to see someone say *why* it is a good thing. It better be something more persuasive then cost.

No responses yet

Feb 20 2006

More thoughts on Pappy Boyington

Published by Karl under Boyington

There has been plenty said already about the Pappy Boyington memorial, but a couple more items popped up that are worthy of note. The first two are courtesy of andrews-dad: First was a resolution introduced in the Senate to support Military recruitment: http://andrews-dad.blogspot.com/2006/02/uw-student-senate-supports-right-of.html

A Resolution in Support of the Right of Military Recruiters to be Present on Campus WHEREAS the military provides meaningful career opportunities for many students; and, WHEREAS the military is also the defender of our freedoms and way of life; and, WHEREAS at the Seattle Central Community College campus military recruiters were attacked by protesters last year; and, WHEREAS we want to make sure this kind of intolerance does not happen on our campus, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: THAT we support military recruiters’ right to be on our campus, and THAT we support ROTC’s continued right to be present on campus, and THAT we further support and respect the fine men and women who serve our country.

One response so far

Next »

  • Welcome to Leaning Straight Up



    Contact Me
    Follow me on Twitter
    My Website

    I am unapologetic
    about being patriotic


    We Must Not Forget


    Leaning Straight Up Honors:
    Robert William McPadden, age 30

  • Buy Me A Pony

    Thank you for supporting Leaning Straight Up
  • Categories

  • Archives

  •  

    February 2006
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728  
  • Hosted by:


    Banner

    blogroll

    Blogroll Me!


    *** - Recently Updated

    Recommended Reading




  • What I'm Doing...

    Posting tweet...

    Powered by Twitter Tools

  • Advertisers




    Support My Sponsors


    Cleanwhites



    Blognet News




    Mailing List


    Sign up to be notified of new posts

    What People are saying about LSU


    “Good blog from a new reader." ~ Lars Larson, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "I really was blown away by the depth of your writing -- do you write for a living? If not, why not? Count me among YOUR fans." ~ Melanie Morgan, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "One of the best Northwest Blogs" ~ Bryan Suits, Radio Talk Show Host KFI 640am

    "Not trying to blow smoke up your butt, but you turn a nice phrase - even though we often disagree!" ~ Ken Schram, Northwest Radio and Television Commentator

    New blog recommendation: ST reader Karl’s blog Leaning Straight Up ~ Sister Toldjah, Nationally recognized blogger

    "It’s a well-written blog and it was enjoying to read through."
    ~ Jon Fredkove, Strategic Name Development







  • Site Stats



  • Syndications