Jun 23 2006
Lt Watada stays while his brigade departs.
Looks like he is now officially in violation of the UCMJ, Article 87, Missing Movement. He also faces more serious charges, if the military decides to hammer him on this, which frankly I hope they do.
I have no problem with a person having an aversion to war. Fine, then stay out of the military. Don’t make an oath, train, bond with your unit then bail when the path strats to look tough. He could have filed for Conscientious Objector status and had his out, but he insisted on making this a political issue by attaching his complaint to the one war. And I hope he rots in prison for it.
Eh? Unfair am I? Harsh maybe? Too bad. I have no respect for him, at all. He violated his oath and his honor and his trust.
The latest, from KOMO TV:
War Objector Lt. Watada Refuses To Go To Iraq
An Army lieutenant who has said he’d rather go to prison than Iraq did not deploy with his unit when it left Thursday for the Middle East, Army officials said.
1st Lt. Ehren Watada, 28, of Honolulu, who joined the Army in March 2003, has said he would be willing to serve in Afghanistan or elsewhere, but has concluded that the war in Iraq is illegal and immoral.
Watada stayed on base in his battalion’s headquarters while members of his unit left Fort Lewis by bus at 6:45 a.m., en route to their flight from nearby McChord Air Force Base, the Army said.
About 4,000 soldiers of Fort Lewis’ 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division were scheduled to be part of this deployment.
"1st Lt. Watada has been ordered to remain on duty at his unit, with some limitations on his pass privileges, pending further instructions from his chain of command," Fort Lewis officials said in a statement.
No charges had been filed against Watada as of Thursday. "None will be filed until the commander has had a chance to review all of the facts of the case and consult with the Staff Judge Advocate," the Army statement said.
Watada said in an interview earlier this month that he researched the reasons behind the U.S. involvement in Iraq and concluded that the government has violated American law.’
"We can’t break laws in order to fight terrorism," he said.
Watada said he believes intelligence on whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was manipulated "to fit a policy that was already implemented prior to 9-11," and he cited "mistreatment of the Iraqi people," saying it was "a contradiction to the Army’s own Law of Land Warfare."
He did not apply for conscientious objector status, defined by Army regulations as a "firm, fixed and sincere objection to participation in a war in any form or the bearing of arms, because of religious training and belief." He said he objected only to the war in Iraq.
His attorney, Eric Seitz, did not immediately return a phone call to his office in Honolulu because he is in Europe.
I pity him in one sense. The looney left like Ann Wright have filled his head with mush about his duty and responsibility, and they have convinced him this is honorable and justified. And when he is in shackles, they will go bye bye and cluster around the next sacrificial lamb they plan to offer up to their cause.
He is nothing but a tool. But as he is a willing tool, he can have his consequences.
Meanwhile, 4000 members of his unit, who understand what an oath means, and can separate politics from principle, have deployed to Iraq. And the tragedy is that some of them are now without a leader because of his actions.
To them, God Speed and a safe return.
To him, God help you.
3 Responses to “Lt Watada stays while his brigade departs.”
Leave a Reply
You can track future comments on this post via this RSS feed. You can trackback this post by pinging this URL.
Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




No Apologies IsraeL…
An Israeli air strike inadvertently killed Ar-ab civilians.
Well guess what?
The civilian deaths may be sorrowful and lamentable, but they also were perfectly justifiable.
……
Great read karl!…I linked to this one…most excellent.
MILITARY.
Is this person so stupid that he does not realize what the military is used for?
It is used in armed conflict, we carry weapons, we use them, we blow things up.
It is not the position of a soldier to question his commanders either.
Whether his ‘belief’ that no weapons of WMD were there or that this was unfounded, I am sure he was not included in the Gnerals briefings, or the intel gathered or what the Congress saw that had them vote for this.
It is patently rediculous that a green LT has the cajoes to question his superiors when he does not have all the information, and is going on his ‘belief’ or what he heard.
I am with you Karl, I do hope they put his ass in chains. I was a ground pounder, and if I questioned my leadership on the media reports I heard or read, my butt would have been in some serious trouble, as his should be now.
When you go into the military, you absolutely KNOW that you have the chance to be called to use what your TRAINED for, to go into battle, or to support those in battle, to go to a foriegn country, ect.
The President is the Commander in Chief, just as Clinton was, and we did not have (as far as I knew) any Defectors like this LT when they went to where Clinton told them to. Though those in the military did not much like Clinton, he was thier superior officer in this case, he was the commander in chief, and when he tells them to jump, they say how high.
Why this LT feels he can get away with this type of action is beyond me.
At the very least he should be jailed and put to hard labor until his unit returns for a court martial.
Thats my opinion on it.