Dec 08 2006

James Brolin denounces 9/11

18 Responses to “James Brolin denounces 9/11”

1. # Rightwing Guyon 08 Dec 2006 at 12:55 pm

   Is Palestinian Civil War The Only Answer?…

   Since January of 2006 we have had to deal with the raving lunatics and suicidal madmen of the ruling party of Hamas, who is lead by Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, after they dealt a huge defeat to the former ruling party of Fatah, who is …..

2. # MGon 13 Dec 2006 at 7:17 am

   "Yea, those phoney airplanes and all that.  All those honey deaths.  Those phoney bodies were really convincing."
   I don’t think he said anyting about the airplanes or the deaths being fake.  He was just saying that it wasn’t only the airplanes that took the building down.

3. # MGon 13 Dec 2006 at 7:18 am

   Buildings

4. # MGon 13 Dec 2006 at 7:21 am

   "Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds and many more."

5. # Karlon 13 Dec 2006 at 10:25 am

   You would have to go to the various 911 conspriacy sites, which do insist that the airplanes were drones and were remotely piloted into the buildings. 

   Brolin is a moron.

    

6. # Karlon 13 Dec 2006 at 10:28 am

   MG,

   There is a big Holocaust denial seminar going on now too, should we save you a seat?

   Because people love to engage in conspiracy theories does not make those theories even remotely true.

   You have gone to a lot of trouble to research the conspriacy, have you researched equally the work done to debunk said theories?

7. # kyleon 14 Dec 2006 at 12:27 am

   come on, do you really believe 911 was not done by insiders. please i implore you look at the evidence again.

8. # Karlon 14 Dec 2006 at 12:55 am

   Please, I implore you to put the crack pipe down.

9. # Davidon 17 Dec 2006 at 7:27 am

   Mr. Brolin is not alone in his questioning of the “official” account of 9/11.

   Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Critics of 9/11 Commission Report

   Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11.

   The following web site is a collection of their public statements:

   Patriots Question 9/11

   http://patriotsquestion911.com/

10. # Davidon 17 Dec 2006 at 7:28 am

    Support the 9/11 families.

    Watch the new film documenting their struggle for truth.

    “9/11: Press for Truth”

    The Story

    “We felt the country was at risk from terrorists and from incompetence…and maybe worse.” —Lorie Van Auken, September 11th Widow

    Following the attacks of September 11th, a small group of grieving families waged a tenacious battle against those who sought to bury the truth about the event—including, to their amazement, President Bush. In ‘9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH’, six of them, including three of the famous “Jersey Girls”, tell for the first time the powerful story of how they took on the greatest powers in Washington—and won!—compelling an investigation, only to subsequently watch the 9/11 Commission fail in answering most of their questions.

    Adapting Paul Thompson’s definitive Complete 9/11 Timeline (published by HarperCollins as ‘The Terror Timeline’), the filmmakers collaborate with documentary veterans Globalvision (‘WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception’, ‘Beyond JFK’) to stitch together rare overlooked news clips, buried stories, and government press conferences, revealing a pattern of official lies, deception and spin. As a result, a very different picture of 9/11 emerges, one that raises new and more pressing questions.

    What actions were taken by top government officials who received dozens of specific warnings before the attack? Was Osama Bin Laden and his top al Qaeda leadership allowed to escape U.S. forces in Afghanistan? And what has been the reason for the deliberate obscuring of evidence for state sponsorship? Perhaps the most important one of all: Why, five years later, are so many of the families’ questions still unanswered?

    Watch the trailer for this film at the official website (2 minute running time)

    http://www.911pressfortruth.com/

    Watch the entire film at Google video (1 hour 24 minute running time):

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250&q=Press+for+Truth

11. # Karlon 18 Dec 2006 at 2:45 am

    Been there done that.

    And every aspect of those ‘questions’ has been well debunked.

12. # maryon 28 Dec 2006 at 4:50 pm

    It would serve people of fame to hang there hats on the real issue:
    1-World Hunger, 2-genocide, 3-bigotry wherever found,4-Poverty of the inhumane kind!
     
    mary SC
     

13. # Michael Madisonon 02 Jan 2007 at 4:39 pm

    If anyone thinks our goverment is honest with us check out http://www.freedomtofacism.com it is all true.

14. # Karlon 02 Jan 2007 at 4:45 pm

    I better get my tinfoil out.

15. # Janeon 13 Jan 2007 at 6:09 pm

    Patriots Question 9/11

    Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Government Critics of 9/11 Commission Report

    Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11.

    This web site is a collection of their public statements: http://patriotsquestion911.com/

16. # The Thin Manon 15 Jan 2007 at 9:58 am

    Hello –
    Would have been here awhile earlier, but there are so many websites with posting blogs out there, and for the most part, I just sit and read them – sometimes amused, with the reasons that create that amusement multi-faceted. Depends on the approach of the blather.And it’s blather that has me leaving a post here, which I’m sure shall and will be construed as blather, in and of itself. That’s fine, because I know I do enough of it.Okay, for starters, I would like to point out that I consider myself to be a ‘Constitutionalist’, but for the sake of argument here, I am a ‘Republocrat’ – to fall within the left-right views here, even though the lines of that paradigm have been getting more and more blurred the past few years.But I love my Constitution, and my Bill of Rights, so ‘Constitutionalist’ to me, is more apropo.Like any sane, sympathetic American, I stared in disbelief as those towers fell, and felt nothing but sadness for those people affected from this tragedy.However, then building #7 fell later that day – remember that one? It only fell roughly 6 or 7 hours later, not hit by any plane, but due to ‘internal fires’. I thought that was a bit odd, but so much occurred that day, the memory of that was pushed away for a little while.
    It was sometime around mid-2004 when, while I was questioning what exactly was in store for us, what with Bush and Kerry both being Skull and Bones members, as well as being related to each other, that I stumbled across a passage about Larry Silverstein, who had eventually purchased the entire World Trade Center complex in the summer of 2001, openly stating that building #7 was ‘pulled’, i.e. imploded through the use of explosions. This statement appeared in the PBS documentary: America Rebuilds - A Year at Ground Zero.
    Silverstein’s statement entirely contradicted the official explanation. See for yourself:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7he_sAVs0A
    Keep in mind how fast building #7 fell. Now apply that same falling rate to Towers #1 and #2.If Silverstein admitted this on film, who’s to say the other two were not also meant to come down.Keep in mind as well, that planting explosives takes time, sometimes many WEEKS, to make sure all of the main supports that are needed to be destroyed, are done so effectively.And that’s what got me started. Believe me, I am a person who ALWAYS questions things, and I questioned the validity of what I was reading deeply. I still do.However, now sooo many questions I’ve had regarding the invasion of Iraq, Homeland Security (with its Hitlerian undertones), the Patriot Act, the Domestic Security Enhancement Act, and most recently, the Military Commissions Act, are now swarmed by a proliferation of answers - with the majority of them stinging and not painting a pretty picture.
    This isn’t a conspiracy game.
    This is a conspiracy.
    So, who’s all in for the National ID card? Oh wait, look at the back of your driver’s license…I think it’s already here.Anyone up for getting ‘chipped’?Okay, I’m digressing…back to the topic.
    Here’s a good place to start…right into overload. Keep in mind this person drew almost all of the links provided within this site’s pages from actual news articles that appeared in papers from all over:
    http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/index.html
    Two movies that I highly recommend for anyone who wishes to learn more are:
    9/11 Press for Truth (which looks at it from the viewpoint that it was 19 hijackers and some guy in a cave - what is uncovered here is enough to raise a couple eyebrows)
    Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (which chronicles the RNC event in New York in 2004, and also discusses a little back story on the events of 9/11 (that it wasn’t 19 hijackers blah, blah)) - the approach is a little sensational, but is a hoot. You don’t feel like you are sitting through a two-and-a-half hour documentary.
    I personally own the Steven Jones lecture he gave at Utah Valley State College (that wacko from BYU), and am glad he mentions the toxic dust that was so prevalent the days and weeks following the collapses.
    If you don’t know about this, I strongly encourage everyone who reads this to do some research and find out more.
    60 Minutes even did a report on it last September:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/07/60minutes/main1982332.shtml
    Unfortunately, outside of a few scant articles here and there, this is another travesty quietly being pushed away from the front burners.Remember, Guiliani shipped the remains of the towers overseas - part of the clean-up process, which was one of many questions the Family Steering Committee (comprised of members who lost loved ones in the attacks) wished for him to answer:
    http://www.911independentcommission.org/giuliani31804.html
    I encourage everyone to read and watch and read some more. But watch out for Bill O’Reilly; he tends to flip-flop his viewpoint on things. Here he is on the WWII Malmedy massacre, as called on by Keith Olbermann:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKG93i5ISmc&mode=related&search=
    But here he is, on his website, stating the opposite:
    ‘After German SS troops massacred 86 American soldiers at Malmedy in Belgium on December 17th, 1944, some units like the US 11th Armored Division took revenge on captured German soldiers.’
    In case you don’t believe me, here’s the link to his site:
    http://www.billoreilly.com/site/product?pid=18939
    Apparently he’s learned a trick or two from John Kerry.Anyway, please research, research, research. History appears to be repeating itself, and with all the technological achievements abound today, this repeat has some seriously dour potential.
    Until next time…

17. # The Thin Manon 15 Jan 2007 at 11:22 pm

    Okay, next time I won’t copy and paste — I forgot to leave out the ‘blather’ part. That was beneficial elsewhere, but not here. I truly apologize. Kudos to everyone who is taking the time to continue to pursue this, as I am as well.
    I woke up in the summer of 2004, never to sleep again…

18. # Greenon 25 Apr 2007 at 3:04 am

    Hi Sam! Photos i send on e-mail.
    Green

Leave a Reply

You can track future comments on this post via this RSS feed. You can trackback this post by pinging this URL.

Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>