<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats, including Pelosi, originally supported a troop surge-  FLIP!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-44468</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/#comment-44468</guid>
		<description>The problem is, I have seen more than one comment that a surge would have been effective...A YEAR AGO. More than one commentator said that this is what he should have been doing BEFORE things had gotten to where they are at.&#160; Now, there is question if a surge of 22,000 is enough to make the difference?
The Bush Administration&#160;seems to be the working definition of insanity.&#160; Keep doing the same thing repeatedly expecting different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, I have seen more than one comment that a surge would have been effective&#8230;A YEAR AGO. More than one commentator said that this is what he should have been doing BEFORE things had gotten to where they are at.&nbsp; Now, there is question if a surge of 22,000 is enough to make the difference?<br />
The Bush Administration&nbsp;seems to be the working definition of insanity.&nbsp; Keep doing the same thing repeatedly expecting different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-44241</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/#comment-44241</guid>
		<description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;How do you answer the fact that the Iraq study group recommended an initial surge, and all the democrats wanted him to adopt the ISG recommendations?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#160;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;And if he had said &#34;you have asked me for years to ramp up, and I finally see the wisdom of your ideas&#34; would that make it better?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#160;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Plus, not all were 18 months ago.&#160; I just used Pelosi as the centerpiece.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#160;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The fact is that a lot of&#160;the democrats are anti Bush, so that makes them against his ideas.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>How do you answer the fact that the Iraq study group recommended an initial surge, and all the democrats wanted him to adopt the ISG recommendations?</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>And if he had said &quot;you have asked me for years to ramp up, and I finally see the wisdom of your ideas&quot; would that make it better?</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Plus, not all were 18 months ago.&nbsp; I just used Pelosi as the centerpiece.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>The fact is that a lot of&nbsp;the democrats are anti Bush, so that makes them against his ideas.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-44240</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/01/11/democrats-including-pelosi-originally-supported-a-troop-surge-flip/#comment-44240</guid>
		<description>You are trying to nail them for changing thier minds a year and a half LATER?&#160; Boy, when I have noted the fact that Bush opposed nation building before he was elected, but then changed his mind when it came to Iraq, I am told that their are circumstances that forced him to re-evaluate.&#160; But when a democrat changed position (or a Republican turns his back on a Bush supported policy) they are suddenly &#34;traitors&#34; and &#34;liars&#34;.&#160; A lot&#160;happened between 2004 and 2007.&#160; &#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are trying to nail them for changing thier minds a year and a half LATER?&nbsp; Boy, when I have noted the fact that Bush opposed nation building before he was elected, but then changed his mind when it came to Iraq, I am told that their are circumstances that forced him to re-evaluate.&nbsp; But when a democrat changed position (or a Republican turns his back on a Bush supported policy) they are suddenly &quot;traitors&quot; and &quot;liars&quot;.&nbsp; A lot&nbsp;happened between 2004 and 2007.&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
