Jun 07 2007
Is Paris Hilton now in violation of the court order?
Sure seems that way. At the least, the City attorney is complaining the Sheriff is in contempt of the order for releasing her after just three days to home monitoring.
MSNBC is reporting that she has a court hearing tomorrow to determine if she has to go back to jail.
It seems the Judge’s order sending her to jail specifically forbid her to have home monitoring.
See the document and story below.
It does clearly indicate no electronic monitoring.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19102663/
Paris Hilton’s release from jail may be short lived.
Hours after she was sent home under house arrest Thursday for an undisclosed medical condition, the judge who put her in jail for violating her reckless-driving probation ordered her into court to decide if she should go back behind bars.
Hilton must report to court at 9 a.m. Friday, Superior Court spokesman Allan Parachini told The Associated Press.
“My understanding is she will be brought in in a sheriff’s vehicle from her home,” Parachini said.
The celebrity inmate was sent home from the Los Angeles County jail’s Lynwood lockup shortly after 2 a.m. in a stunning reduction to her original 45-day sentence. She had reported to jail Sunday night after attending the MTV Movie Awards in a strapless designer dress.
She was ordered to finish her sentence under house arrest, meaning she could not leave her four-bedroom, three-bath home in the Hollywood Hills until next month.
City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo complained that he learned of her release the same way as almost everyone else — through news reports.
Then, late Thursday, he filed a petition questioning whether Sheriff Lee Baca should be held in contempt of court for releasing Hilton — and demanding that she be held in custody. Superior Court Judge Michael T. Sauer’s decision to haul Hilton back to the courtroom came shortly after.
“It is the city attorney’s position that the decision on whether or not Ms. Hilton should be released early and placed on electronic monitoring should be made by Judge Sauer and not the Sheriff’s Department,” said Jeffrey Isaacs of the city attorney’s office.
Sauer himself had expressed his unhappiness with Hilton’s release before Delgadillo asked him to return her to court. When he sentenced Hilton to jail last month, he ruled specifically that she could not serve her sentence at home under electronic monitoring.
Delgadillo’s office indicated that it would argue that the Sheriff’s Department violated Sauer’s May 4 sentencing order.
This just gets stranger and stranger.
I don’t have a lot of compassion for her in one sense, as she already got a fairly light treatment by being placed in the special unit.
And to hear she had a rash and was crying and couldn’t eat the food didn’t really move me. People are upset about being in jail every day. They get over it. They get rashes and rather the go home, they get treated and go back to their cell.
She has endured worse on that stupid TV show, so this is just spoiled rotten theater, in my opinion.
I hope he tosses her back in and orders her to stay and serve the whole sentence.
My personal guess is that the Sheriff was tired of her whining.
What? I’m a cold hearted bastard? Well, ok. So what? I obey laws and I take responsibility for my actions. Why should she be held to a lower standard because she has more money then I do?
And despite people like Al Sharpton coming out and complaining it is a “white” issues, it isn’t. It’s a green one: Money.
Trackposted to Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Republic, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, The Random Yak, guerrilla radio, DeMediacratic Nation, On the Horizon, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Magical Rose Garden, stikNstein… has no mercy, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
2 Responses to “Is Paris Hilton now in violation of the court order?”
Leave a Reply
You can track future comments on this post via this RSS feed. You can trackback this post by pinging this URL.
Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





Why is a slut that only became famous for pornographic videos and her parent’s name even a story? This is just bad theatre, like the rest of her life.
I’ve got no sympathy for her at all, and I hope the judge throws the book at her this time. I hope he throws some extra time in for violating the original court order too.
I have been visiting this site a lot lately, so i thought it is a good idea to show my appreciation with a comment.
Thanks,
Jim Mirkalami
PS: I am a single dad!