Oct 22 2007
John Stossel exposes the Global Warming Myth on 20/20
A brilliant assessment and expose of the Gore fueled Global Warming fraud.
Watch it, it is one of the best summaries of the flaws in the Global Warming Alarmists dogma.
Still think the science is settled?
Rather than blame the Anti Alarmists for interrupting science and policy, we should be thanking them for allowing research to continue before we do something presumptuous and do more harm than good.
Here, as an encore, is Stossel on Ethanol.
Trackposted to Stop the ACLU, Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, Perri Nelson’s Website, , Stix Blog, Right Truth, The Populist, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Adeline and Hazel, Stageleft, , third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, A Blog For All, AZAMATTEROFACT, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Inside the Northwest Territory, , Webloggin, Big Dog’s Weblog, Cao’s Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Nuke’s, Allie Is Wired, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, Republican National Convention Blog, High Desert Wanderer, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
2 Responses to “John Stossel exposes the Global Warming Myth on 20/20”
Leave a Reply
You can track future comments on this post via this RSS feed. You can trackback this post by pinging this URL.
Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





This interview was before the recent fires in California. What do you say now?
> Comment:
> This interview was before the recent fires in California. What do you say now?
About what?
About fires that were spread by winds that happen every year, with some years being worse then others?
Or about the impact of environmentalism on forest and brush management and how that gave the fires an increased fuel supply?
The Fires are not Bush’s fault nor are they the result of Global Warming (as many politicians, pundits and environmentalists are presently claiming), and if anything they show the danger of making legislation on the basis of environmental policies without fully understanding the resulting consequences.