<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Burris be seated?  Should Coleman concede?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leaningstraightup.com/2009/01/07/should-burris-be-seated-should-coleman-concede/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2009/01/07/should-burris-be-seated-should-coleman-concede/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2009/01/07/should-burris-be-seated-should-coleman-concede/comment-page-1/#comment-186967</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaningstraightup.com/?p=2485#comment-186967</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the Constitutional/legal question? Who flippin' cares any more? The Congress (and successive presidents) for the past 40-50 years haven't given a fig for Constitutional limitations, nor have the laws on the books meant anything to them but rules to game. Anarcho-tyranny is the only rule of the day.

Hmmm, maybe it is coming up on time for a third American Revolution, since the first two were such successes for those who waged them (although Lincoln's revolt against the Constitution has had a longer success).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the Constitutional/legal question? Who flippin&#8217; cares any more? The Congress (and successive presidents) for the past 40-50 years haven&#8217;t given a fig for Constitutional limitations, nor have the laws on the books meant anything to them but rules to game. Anarcho-tyranny is the only rule of the day.</p>
<p>Hmmm, maybe it is coming up on time for a third American Revolution, since the first two were such successes for those who waged them (although Lincoln&#8217;s revolt against the Constitution has had a longer success).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://leaningstraightup.com/2009/01/07/should-burris-be-seated-should-coleman-concede/comment-page-1/#comment-186964</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaningstraightup.com/?p=2485#comment-186964</guid>
		<description>Touchy questions. I hold that, in order to reduce its appearance of stupidity, the body of Dhimmicrappic seantors should NOT seat anyone who talks, as Burris did on the record, of going to Washington to deal with "converging parallel crises". (And the high school, college and law schools he graduated from should have their collective knuckles rapped for passing such an illiterate boob on--parallels, by definition--canNOT converge.)

As to Coleman throwing in the towel, nope. Any rational analysis of the shenanigans Franken and his partisans have engaged in would mean he'd be conceding the race to a far, far bigger crook than he is. Why make the senatorial half of Congress any more crooked (and stupid) than it already is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touchy questions. I hold that, in order to reduce its appearance of stupidity, the body of Dhimmicrappic seantors should NOT seat anyone who talks, as Burris did on the record, of going to Washington to deal with &#8220;converging parallel crises&#8221;. (And the high school, college and law schools he graduated from should have their collective knuckles rapped for passing such an illiterate boob on&#8211;parallels, by definition&#8211;canNOT converge.)</p>
<p>As to Coleman throwing in the towel, nope. Any rational analysis of the shenanigans Franken and his partisans have engaged in would mean he&#8217;d be conceding the race to a far, far bigger crook than he is. Why make the senatorial half of Congress any more crooked (and stupid) than it already is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
