Jan 13 2009

Google responds

Published by Karl at 12:39 am under Global Warming, eco-nanny

Yesterday I blogged the latest Global Warming nuttery, where they figured out the CO2 footprint of a Google Search.

Of course Google, never at a loss for words, responded:

Not long ago, answering a query meant traveling to the reference desk of your local library. Today, search engines enable us to access immense quantities of useful information in an instant, without leaving home. Tools like email, online books and photos, and video chat all increase productivity while decreasing our reliance on car trips, pulp and paper.

But as computers become a bigger part of more people’s lives, information technology consumes an increasing amount of energy, and Google takes this impact seriously. That’s why we have designed and built the most energy efficient data centers in the world, which means the energy used per Google search is minimal. In fact, in the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will use more energy than Google uses to answer your query.

Recently, though, others have used much higher estimates, claiming that a typical search uses “half the energy as boiling a kettle of water” and produces 7 grams of CO2. We thought it would be helpful to explain why this number is *many* times too high. Google is fast — a typical search returns results in less than 0.2 seconds. Queries vary in degree of difficulty, but for the average query, the servers it touches each work on it for just a few thousandths of a second. Together with other work performed before your search even starts (such as building the search index) this amounts to 0.0003 kWh of energy per search, or 1 kJ. For comparison, the average adult needs about 8000 kJ a day of energy from food, so a Google search uses just about the same amount of energy that your body burns in ten seconds.

In terms of greenhouse gases, one Google search is equivalent to about 0.2 grams of CO2. The current EU standard for tailpipe emissions calls for 140 grams of CO2 per kilometer driven, but most cars don’t reach that level yet. Thus, the average car driven for one kilometer (0.6 miles for those in the U.S.) produces as many greenhouse gases as a thousand Google searches.

We’ve made great strides to reduce the energy used by our data centers, but we still want clean and affordable sources of electricity for the power that we do use. In 2008 our philanthropic arm, Google.org, invested $45 million in breakthrough clean energy technologies. And last summer, as part of our Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal initiative (RE<C), we created an internal engineering group dedicated to exploring clean energy.

We’re also working with other members of the IT community to improve efficiency on a broader scale. In 2007 we co-founded the Climate Savers Computing Initiative, a group which champions more efficient computing. This non-profit consortium is committed to cutting the energy consumed by computers in half by 2010 — reducing global CO2 emissions by 54 million tons per year. That’s a lot of kettles of tea.

Update on 1/12 @ 4 PM: Harvard professor Alex Wissner-Gross provided new details on his energy research, in a TechNewsWorld article.

What’s next, I cannot help but wonder?

The CO2 footprint of a telephone? 

Of the CD player in your car?

Your iPod?

Your hairdryer or electric razor?

Face it folks, we are modern, and civilized, and to us that means appliances, including TVs, computers, DVD players, Clock radios, lamps, toasters, microwave ovens and even the lowly digital watch.

Time to accept that and get over it.

Unless we are planning to return to frontier days.

But what then?  Will we go after other heavy electricity usages? 

How about hospitals?

MRI and Xray machines consume mass amounts of electricity, as do other diagnostic machines necessary to the preservation of human life.

Will we take people off life support to feed our global warming frenzy?

Trackposted to Nuke’s, , Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, third world county, Political Byline, Woman Honor Thyself, Adam’s Blog, The World According to Carl, DragonLady’s World, The Pink Flamingo, A Newt One/ American Truth Warriors, Democrat=Socialist, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

One Response to “Google responds”

  1. Perri Nelsonon 13 Jan 2009 at 9:47 am

    I think some of the alarmists and so-called “environmentalists” want us to return to pre-frontier days. Some of them act as if the species should never have left the rift valleys in Africa, or come down from the trees.

  • Welcome to Leaning Straight Up



    Contact Me
    Follow me on Twitter
    My Website

    I am unapologetic
    about being patriotic


    We Must Not Forget


    Leaning Straight Up Honors:
    Robert William McPadden, age 30

  • Buy Me A Pony

    Thank you for supporting Leaning Straight Up
  • Categories

  • Archives

  •  

    January 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Hosted by:


    Banner

    blogroll

    Blogroll Me!


    *** - Recently Updated

    Recommended Reading




  • What I'm Doing...

    Posting tweet...

    Powered by Twitter Tools

  • Advertisers




    Support My Sponsors


    Cleanwhites



    Blognet News




    Mailing List


    Sign up to be notified of new posts

    What People are saying about LSU


    “Good blog from a new reader." ~ Lars Larson, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "I really was blown away by the depth of your writing -- do you write for a living? If not, why not? Count me among YOUR fans." ~ Melanie Morgan, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "One of the best Northwest Blogs" ~ Bryan Suits, Radio Talk Show Host KFI 640am

    "Not trying to blow smoke up your butt, but you turn a nice phrase - even though we often disagree!" ~ Ken Schram, Northwest Radio and Television Commentator

    New blog recommendation: ST reader Karl’s blog Leaning Straight Up ~ Sister Toldjah, Nationally recognized blogger

    "It’s a well-written blog and it was enjoying to read through."
    ~ Jon Fredkove, Strategic Name Development







  • Site Stats



  • Syndications