Jan 13 2009
Shocking lawsuit: Hooters sexually discriminates by making Hooters girls actually be girls
This is a goofy lawsuit on its face except for one element that I will comment on in a moment.
Nikolai Grushevski, a man from Corpus Christi, has filed a lawsuit because Hooters wouldn’t let him work as a waiter, which we guess would be called a Hooters Boy.
“Hooters tries to circumvent the law by referring to its waiters as ‘Hooters Girls.’ Hooters is wrong,” claims the lawsuit, filed yesterday in federal court in Corpus. “Just as Southwest Airlines attempted nearly three decades ago with stewardesses, the waiter’s position addressed herein is being limited to females by an employer ‘…who merely wishes to exploit female sexuality as a marketing tool to attract customers and insure profitability.’”
Exactly. Thankfully, the lawsuit says that Grushevski isn’t trying to stop the restaurant from hiring Hooters Girls.
OK, on the face of the lawsuit, the guy suing is actually correct. It is a practice that sexually discriminates, as it applies a job that is traditionally gender neutral, a waiter/waitress, and locks it into a female only model.
But at the same time, I think the free market ought to handle this. If you disagree with their only hiring young busty girls as waitresses, vote with your wallet. Obviously the public outrage seems to be somewhat…err…subdued.
Except…
There is a part of me that hopes they win. After all women have been playing this game for decades, using lawsuits and accusations of discrimination to gain access to all manner of careers.
In most cases I don’t really care. As long as the person can do the job, let them apply.
What has always bothered me is that many times I just don’t see why they need to bust the status quo this way. For example, the most ridiculous one was female sports reporters suing for access to male locker rooms.
I’m still waiting for the gender reversed efforts there…
And another place that bothered me was when standards had to be lowered for women to qualify for the jobs. I think that unless the standards were artificially inflated to keep them out, that is a dangerous precedent.
This is akin to the lowering of admissions scores to qualify otherwise unqualified college applicants because of their race or gender.
And as Hooters says, they have the right to hiring whom they think and should be left alone. Since our culture has made it clear that is not acceptable, then this lawsuit should be a no brainer.
So a part of me that thinks we have become a society that has traded common sense for litigation hopes the guys win.
I have to note that if this was a male policy of beefcake guys at a family restaurant, likely there would be more sympathy. But that is speculation.
Apparently this has been tried before, when Hooter’s settled out of court and agreed to allow guys to be bus boys and bartenders.
Hooters has agreed to pay $3.75 million to settle a lawsuit filed by men who were denied jobs by the restaurant chain, which is known for its voluptuous and scantily clad female bartenders and servers.
The settlement allows Hooters to continue luring customers with a female staff of Hooters Girls. But the chain also agreed to create a few other support jobs, like bartenders and hosts, that must be filled without regard to sex.
3.75 Mil…think the 7 guys are laughing to the bank? not so much…
Three men from the Chicago area sued Hooters after being denied employment at an Orland Park, Ill., restaurant. Each of them will get $19,100. Four men who filed a similar lawsuit in Maryland will receive $10,350 each.
A stunning amount of wealth. At least the lawyers are happy.
At any rate, this is the result of a society that stands in such a hypocritical place as to say in one breath that we are all equal, and gender neutrality is the law, while at the same time allowing gender restrictions to permeate so many places in society.
Hooters, for what it’s worth has a simple premise. They are betting that more people who come to their eatery would rather see this:

As opposed to this:

(the photo above was made by Hooters, using a manager, Vince Gigliotti)
You make the call.
Trackposted to Nuke’s, , Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, third world county, Political Byline, Woman Honor Thyself, Adam’s Blog, The World According to Carl, DragonLady’s World, The Pink Flamingo, A Newt One/ American Truth Warriors, Democrat=Socialist, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
2 Responses to “Shocking lawsuit: Hooters sexually discriminates by making Hooters girls actually be girls”





Why should he be denied the opportunity to make good money as a waiter there? Of course any red blooded 22 year old wants to work at Hooters, beer, sports, hot women, lots of customers- where else can he make good money in Corpus?
Not only that…but what else are they discriminating about, hair color, race, religion, where does it end???
…And as Hooters says, they have the right to hiring whom they think and should be left alone. Since our culture has made it clear that is not acceptable, then this lawsuit should be a no brainer.
Our culture sucks. Why shouldn’t business owners have the right to decide who is employed in their business? It is their property, it is their business.
As the author noted, customers who disapprove can take their business elsewhere.
Obviously there is a demand for the type of restaurant Hooters is. Why punish Hooters’ customers and the Hooters business owners to appease some jackass looking to get rich off a lawsuit.
Its BS like this, the drug war, prostitution laws, etc that makes this country suck.
Discrimination laws do not end discrimination, the evolution of our culture as each new generation grows up and comes into power is what changes things like discrimination.
Next thing you know, someone will start suing strip clubs for only employing female dancers. A-holes.