Feb 05 2009
Obama’s administration’s ethics
Mr hope and change has a problem. He keeps acting like a normal politician. He nominates Geitner for Secretary of treasury, despite the fact he had unpaid taxes. Geitner somehow is approved.
Then Tom Daschle resigns under a cloud of shame also for taxes, and Obama gravely admits his mistake.
But hey what about Geitner? Will you ask him to resign as he had tax issues too? I doubt it. If he did I might give him some respect.
Then we have his stern rules about lobbyists…which were immediately waived for some other appointees. No rule like a rule not enforced…
Congress is filled with examples of elitists who ignore the law and when called on it, they sadly admit a mistake, and get forgiven.
What happened to being above reproach? To being a servant to the law and to the people?
And now Obama adds another shady character to the pile, none other than King County’s own Ron Sims.
Unfortunately, as our friend Stefan Sharkansky reports from Sound Politics, Obama’s appointment of Ron Sims to the #2 position at HUD sends exactly the opposite message. A court levied the biggest fine for illegal record withholding against Sims in Washington State history — and that record hasn’t finished yet:
Sims is culpable for what may well become the largest fine for violations of public records laws in U.S. history: see Yousoufian, Armen
My own public records suit against Sims (for delaying release of election records which revealed that King County officials unlawfully counted hundreds of ineligible ballots in the 2004 governor’s race) goes to trial in April.
The Yousoufian case should have derailed Sims’ appointment all by itself. The Seattle Times just reported on the state Supreme Court decision that demanded a higher fine for King County under Sims’ governance for illegally blocking records that Yousoufian wanted to investigate the public financing of Qwest Field, the stadium where the Seattle Seahawks now play. Their years-long delay ensured that Yousoufian could not find any potentially damaging information before a referendum that approved public financing for the NFL stadium. The court found “hundreds” of instances where they gave misleading information or refused to give information at all while Sims was King County Executive.
Sharkansky feels Yousoufian’s pain. When the Seattle blogger attempted to investigate King County’s performance in the 2004 election, the county — under Sims’ governance — gave him the same kind of runaround rather than comply with legal records requests. Sharkansky eventually discovered what Sims and King County wanted to keep hidden: they counted ineligible ballots during the recount to give Christine Gregoire the necessary margin of victory over Dino Rossi for governor. Sharkansky’s suit will finally go to trial in April. Sims might get called to testify, and if Sharkansky wins, King County can expect to pay another large fine to mitigate Sims’ mismanagement and opacity.
So much for hope and change and Obama’s call for transparency.
How many more scandals and proofs of his lack of judgment will we see in his first 100 days?
The only bright spot? We got rid of Ron Sims here in Seattle.
Trackposted to The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Wingless - Alastair Crooke on Gaza & Hamas - living in the twilight zone!, DragonLady’s World, Wingless - Sura 5:32 - When Killing isn’t Murder, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, Nuke’s, Political Byline, Allie is Wired, third world county, Faultline USA, Woman Honor Thyself, Wingless - What Lead to Cast Lead, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Wingless - Cuba: Beautiful Country, People…Not so Beautiful System…, Rosemary’s News and Ideas, The Pink Flamingo, Wingless, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
2 Responses to “Obama’s administration’s ethics”





I agree 100%.
Why these politicians can get away with murder (both literally and figuratively speaking) is freakin’ amazing.
I really hope people hold Obama to all his promises. As he appears more and more “human,” maybe people will realize that their check ain’t comin’, and that this guy is full of it.
I’m pulling for the guy (although I didn’t vote for him, and you couldn’t have paid me to do so), because I do want things to get better. I want the value of my house to go back up. I want my job to be a little more secure in an unstable economy. And sure, wouldn’t we all just love world peace?
But why Obama feels as though his job is to control the economy is beyond me.
Maybe if I go to sleep, when I wake up, this will all be a bad dream?
I tried that, no such luck….
LSU