Archive for the 'Apple' Category

Mar 16 2007

Oh come on: Abortion sympathy cards?

Published by Karl under Abortion, Apple

I saw this at several blogs, including Sister Toldjah, and at first I thought it had to be a joke.  It isn’t.

We now have, in our culture of uber-sensitivity, abortion sympathy cards:

Do you know someone who’s had an abortion?

Are you having trouble knowing what to say?

Do you want to let them know you care?

Send them an e-card.

Remember, each person’s experience with abortion is unique. These e-cards were created to address the range of experiences people can have with abortion. As you consider which e-card to send, think about the person you are sending it to. What do they need to know? What are they feeling? What message will provide the most comfort?

The group bills itself as an “After Abortion Resource” center.

Exhale was created by and for women who have abortions.  The founders of Exhale — Aspen Baker, Susan Criscione, Carolina De Robertis, Anna Goldstein and Laura Perez — gathered together for the first time, on the floor of a Berkeley apartment, in June 2000. These five women came together because they, or someone they knew, had personally experienced the lack of non-judgmental services available for women and their significant others after an abortion. 

I won’t deny that there is a need for after abortion resources, and no I do not mean prosecution for murder.  But being fairly pro life, I have to say the degree of sympathy is, IMHO misplaced.

Examples:

ST had this to say about this one:

Your “loss”? How can an abortion be considered a ‘loss’ when the aborted baby isn’t even considered a growing life in the first place and is instead looked upon as a “parasite” or “blob of tissue”? And furthermore, it’s not a “loss” if you choose to abort it.

Sure. If it is not a life, it is not a loss, right?  It is a choice.

One response so far

May 08 2006

Updated with additional information -> Monroe High School throws out the Gay Baby with the Christian Bathwater

Published by Karl under ACLU, Apple, Stupid Laws, intolerence

Note, the article referenced below implies that the Monroe School district was attempting to deny access to a Bible Study Group.  The article states that  A policy change at Monroe High School aimed at keeping public funds out of Bible studies is striking a blow to a less controversial student activity. 

The implication that the Monroe SD had said intention was fairly straight forward, and in part was what my blog was based on.  A call to the Herald reporter revealed that Monroe High was not actively involved with any bible related clubs in the course of this ruling.  It was taking its action in an apparently preemptive move based on the results of a federal lawsuit in Bethel School in 2002. 

The intention of the article was to imply that the policy’s inception had been to deny a bible club access when it was implemented by Bethel SD, and that Monroe SD was implementing a similar policy, for reasons unstated.

I would note that the accusation that the policy was implemented to deny the gay club formal recognitions, which was addressed and denied in the article, may actually be the accusation closer to the truth.  See below for more information and a history of the lawsuit.

Monroe High School, a small School in Northern Washington has made a policy change that is sure to have repercussions that ripple farther outward.

At issue is student clubs.  The situation is apparently that a Christian Club was being denied access and ASB funds, a privilege that other clubs enjoyed, and protested, citing the Supreme Court Ruling concerning equal access.

The school reviewed its options and decided the only way to prevent those darn Christians from having the same rights was to chuck them all.  So it partitioned the clubs into two classes, curriculum related and not curriculum related.

Any clubs not directly related to school curriculum will not be recognized.  And so to stop the Christians they tossed the baby out with the bath water.

The Christian Club was not the only one affected, as hit by this was the Multicultural Club, the Gay Straight Alliance, and the Kiwanis sponsored Key Club.  Here is the story.

12 responses so far

Aug 13 2005

Apple blunder gives Gates iPod royalty

Published by Karl under Apple

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article305638.ece Apple blunder gives Gates iPod royalty By Katherine Griffiths in New York Apple Computer may be forced to pay royalties to Microsoft for every iPod it sells after it emerged that Bill Gates’s software giant beat Steve Jobs’ firm in the race to file a crucial patent on technology used in the popular portable music players. The total bill could run into hundreds of millions of dollars. Although Apple introduced the iPod in November 2001, it did not file a provisional patent application until July 2002, and a full application was filed only in October that year. In the meantime, Microsoft submitted an application in May 2002 to patent some key elements of music players, including song menu software. Apple and Microsoft were two of several companies that developed portable players, but the iPod, with its sleek design and user-friendly controls, has dominated the market. IPods make up three of every four portable music players bought in the US and account for almost one-third of Apple’s sales. Piper Jaffray, a US analyst, believes Apple will sell 25 million iPods this year, bringing the total sold in the four years since its launch to 35 million. In July, the US Patent and Trademark Office rejected Apple’s application, saying some ideas were similar to an earlier application filed by a Microsoft employee, John Platt. The dispute, which emerged this week on the closely watched website, Appleinsider.com, could lead to Apple having to pay a licence fee for the technology of up to $10 a machine. David Kaefer, Microsoft’s director of intellectual property licensing and business development, said: "In general, our policy is to allow others to license our patents so they can use our innovative methods in their products." Apple has signalled it will resist the move. A spokeswoman said Apple would continue to try to get its patent recognised. The company could take the case to the patent office’s appeals board. "Apple invented and publicly released the iPod interface before the Microsoft patent application was filed," it said in a statement. The battle comes as Microsoft is squaring up against another competitor, Google. Microsoft last month launched a lawsuit against the search-engine giant, accusing it of poaching a top executive to head a new research laboratory in China. The Redmond, Washington-based company also sued the executive, Kai-Fu Lee. Apple Computer may be forced to pay royalties to Microsoft for every iPod it sells after it emerged that Bill Gates’s software giant beat Steve Jobs’ firm in the race to file a crucial patent on technology used in the popular portable music players. The total bill could run into hundreds of millions of dollars. Although Apple introduced the iPod in November 2001, it did not file a provisional patent application until July 2002, and a full application was filed only in October that year. In the meantime, Microsoft submitted an application in May 2002 to patent some key elements of music players, including song menu software. Apple and Microsoft were two of several companies that developed portable players, but the iPod, with its sleek design and user-friendly controls, has dominated the market. IPods make up three of every four portable music players bought in the US and account for almost one-third of Apple’s sales. Piper Jaffray, a US analyst, believes Apple will sell 25 million iPods this year, bringing the total sold in the four years since its launch to 35 million. In July, the US Patent and Trademark Office rejected Apple’s application, saying some ideas were similar to an earlier application filed by a Microsoft employee, John Platt. The dispute, which emerged this week on the closely watched website, Appleinsider.com, could lead to Apple having to pay a licence fee for the technology of up to $10 a machine. David Kaefer, Microsoft’s director of intellectual property licensing and business development, said: "In general, our policy is to allow others to license our patents so they can use our innovative methods in their products." Apple has signalled it will resist the move. A spokeswoman said Apple would continue to try to get its patent recognised. The company could take the case to the patent office’s appeals board. "Apple invented and publicly released the iPod interface before the Microsoft patent application was filed," it said in a statement. The battle comes as Microsoft is squaring up against another competitor, Google. Microsoft last month launched a lawsuit against the search-engine giant, accusing it of poaching a top executive to head a new research laboratory in China. The Redmond, Washington-based company also sued the executive, Kai-Fu Lee.

4 responses so far

  • Welcome to Leaning Straight Up


    Contact Me
    My Seattle PI Blog
    My Website

    I am unapologetic
    about being patriotic

    We Must Not Forget


    Leaning Straight Up Honors:
    Robert William McPadden, age 30

  • Buy Me A Pony

    Thank you for supporting Leaning Straight Up
  • Recent Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  •  

    December 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • Archives



  • Hosted by:


    Banner

    blogroll

    Blogroll Me!


    *** - Recently Updated

    Recommended Reading




  • Advertisers






    Mailing List


    Sign up to be notified of new posts

    What People are saying about LSU


    “Good blog from a new reader." ~ Lars Larson, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "I really was blown away by the depth of your writing -- do you write for a living? If not, why not? Count me among YOUR fans." ~ Melanie Morgan, Syndicated Talk Radio Host

    "One of the best Northwest Blogs" ~ Bryan Suits, Radio Talk Show Host KFI 640am

    "Not trying to blow smoke up your butt, but you turn a nice phrase - even though we often disagree!" ~ Ken Schram, Northwest Radio and Television Commentator

    New blog recommendation: ST reader Karl’s blog Leaning Straight Up ~ Sister Toldjah, Nationally recognized blogger

    "It’s a well-written blog and it was enjoying to read through."
    ~ Jon Fredkove, Strategic Name Development







  • Site Stats



  • Syndications