Jun 01 2008
WA GOP takes a controversial stance on Anchor Babies
One of the news items on Orbusmax was this:
State GOP: No automatic citizenship for kids born in U.S. to illegal immigrants
The state Republican Party adopted a platform Saturday that includes a provision aimed at opposing automatic citizenship for babies born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants.
This is not a new idea...
The state party approved a similar platform plank at its 2006 convention that proved controversial. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution recognizes citizenship for all persons born in the United States.
"Immigration is an issue that a lot of our party activists feel strongly about," state Republican Party Chairman Luke Esser said. "And it's certainly a very defensible position. It's not at all something that's based on race concerns. It's a matter of what is citizenship going to be based on."
And it is going to be just as controversial, and may continue to help the Democrats brand the Republicans as xenophobes and racists.
While it is a popular notion with the anti illegal immigration set, the fact is that there is not much congressional support for a Constitutional Amendment, which near as I can tell is what this would take.
Any legislation will immediately be challenged as being in violation of the 14th, and my personal belief is that the SCOTUS will uphold the conventional notion.
It is not to say the idea is without merit. While pro immigration groups scoff at the notion, the facts actually support the critics. it may hurt some peoples notions, but immigrants do sometimes come here pregnant hoping to deliver while on US soil so as to have the edge in immigration.
It is estimated that as many as 380,000 babies each year fall into this category, and may include not just illegals, but also tourists on a tourist visa (as opposed to a work visa).
The history of the 14th Amendment does support the critics to a degree:










